Hoax - Man-made Climate Change

For several decades, the preachers of the climate apocalypse have been constantly wrong but nevertheless continued to get constant subsidies and media attention. With so many of those failed predictions (see link, link and link), any normal branch of science would learn from their mistakes empirically and improve but such is not the case for the mainstream climate scientists.

Like many branches of science today, it is more a question of dogmatism than real science. However the real motive for the man-made climate change hoax is far more nefarious than it seems as this hoax is the cornerstone of the New World Order. A great documentary on the subject that can be found on YT is the 'The Great Global Warming Swindle'.
Let's investigate first if the climate change is man-made as it is repeated constantly nowadays in the media or if it is simply due to natural causes and why is this hoax pushed.

No Consensus

Peer (Review) Pressure

Consensus is not science

Many forgot that consensus is not science, consensus doesn't determine if a theory is right or wrong.
Its not because they are all wrong that it makes them right.

Michael Crichton, MD
"Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right ... In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus."

Divergence of opinions

Some scientists believe in man-made global warming theory, but think that the natural variability of climate has been seriously underestimated, that man-made global warming is not as urgent a crisis as is commonly believed. Many brave independent scientists like the 500 experts at Friends of Science made a letter to the UN stating that there is no climate emergency and that the IPCC results are deeply flawed. 31,487 American scientists (including 9,029 with PhDs) have signed an online petition stating that there is no serious evidences that human activity cause global warming.

IPCC scam

The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s highly influential Assessment Reports are widely regarded by the scientific community, policymakers and the general public as representing "the scientific consensus on climate change". The IPCC has a clear bias in favor of the theory that climate change is man-made however this doesn't represent the views of 97% of the scientific community as it is portrayed. The scientific community views are much more diverse than it is believed. In other terms, the United Nations, one of the motor of the New World Order, is setting the tone regarding climate change.

As Professor Fred Singer explained here :
The "consensus" of 2,500 scientists on the IPCC is an illusion as most of the panelists have no scientific qualifications, and many of the others object to some part of the IPCC’s report. The Associated Press reported recently that only 52 climate scientists contributed to the report’s "Summary for Policymakers."
Likewise, only about a dozen members of the governing board voted on the "consensus statement" on climate change by the American Meteorological Society (AMS). Rank and file AMS scientists never had a say, which is why so many of them are now openly rebelling. Estimates of skepticism within the AMS regarding man-made global warming are well over 50 percent.

The UN’s climate change panel created an artificial scientific consensus on global warming that doesn't reflect the reality. It is more of a consensus of less than 100 crooked climate scientists with no work ethics than the global consensus.

Data Manipulation

The data used by the official 'climate experts' have been tortured for so long that even Amnesty International could step-in to stop the abuse. The tricks used by governmental agencies to fake a global warming coming or present know no boundaries.

Unreliable dataset

Two independent surveys have found that about 70% of the thermometer stations in the U.S. Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) dataset are currently poorly or badly sited (see paper).
In 2018, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), who maintain the GHCN dataset (an important temperature dataset used by several of the groups calculating global warming) has been flagrantly exposed as manipulating the data in order to increase the recent temperatures and create a fake global warming (See link). The NASA GISS of James Hansen also did the same with its temperature datasets.

In 2022, NOAA made various data adjustments that are routinely applied to the European temperature records and 17 experts discovered that only 17% of those adjustments were consistent from run to run and less than 20% of the adjustments NOAA had been applying corresponded to any event noted by the station observers. (See link).
NOAA, like most governmental agencies, is manipulating its data in order to push the global warming agenda.

Another fraudulent trick was found thanks to the climategate in a hacked mail. The Climatic Research Unit (CRU) has been flagrantly exposed as manipulating the tree ring data (A dataset made using a scientific method of dating tree rings that give climate insights from in history from wood).
They used 'Mike's nature trick' to hide the recent temperatures decline and make the temperatures seems to increase steadily. The trick is an unscientific method to splice the temperature record recorded by thermometers into a series of proxy data collected from tree rings that had been truncated to hide the decline in tree ring data seen after 1980 or so. So in the end, this trick gives the appearance of skyrocketing temperatures by switching your attention from the tree ring reconstruction to the thermometer data.

Flawed studies to push political agenda

The IPCC has almost always based their conclusions on flawed studies when creating their Assessment Reports (AR) (More to be read in this link ). Dr. Santer’s flawed study with the famous "fingerprint" was used to push the global warming propaganda in the IPCC's 2nd Assessment Report in 1995.
The famous Michael Mann's "hockey stick graph" also pushed the same propaganda for the IPCC's 3th Assessment Report in 2001.

Top = True temperature change from IPCC 1st AR
Bottom = Michael Mann's hockey stick graph

Michael Mann created his own flawed temperature dataset of the last 1000 years using paleoclimate reconstruction as seen in the graph above. It suggest that global temperatures had been slowly, but steadily, declining for most of the last millennium, before abruptly starting to rise at the start of the 20th century. Michael Mann combined proxy and instrumental data post-1902 (see link). Combining those 2 datasets like he did is a statistical fraud. This new dataset conveniently match perfectly with the greenhouse gas emissions dataset. Both of those flawed studies have been debunked by numerous climate scientists but that didn't bother much IPCC that had to push its agenda no matter what. In the following years, Michael Mann had a case against a real climatologist in court about his hoax, he defied the judge and refused to surrender his data for examination and subsequently lost the case.

In the years after, the IPPC forced scientists to have models that account for natural causes as well as the human causes. As explained here, the scientists also used flawed datasets like the PMOD dataset (a dataset that has low variability in the solar radiation outputs and make it basically just noise) or temperatures taken from rural and urban areas instead of rural areas only (the temperature in urban areas will necessarily be higher due to human activity and not reflect global temperature).

All those changes ensured that almost zero contribution from natural factors could ever be found by climate scientists. Whatever the IPCC scientists produce could only lead to the wrong conclusion that global warming is man-made. The circle has been closed.

Natural Causes

Is there really an unprecedented global warming ?

The global temperature data used by climate scientists have been tampered so much that it is hard to assess it (see link). Just in 2017, 58 papers and 80 new graphs were published undermining the global warming consensus.
Extensive analysis of temperature trends in the Arctic reveals that there has been no detectable long-term change since the beginning of the 20th century, and thus predictions of a sea ice-free Arctic in the coming decades due to dramatically rising temperatures are not rooted in observation (see link).
The sea level increase the Earth has experienced over the past century is not unusual historically, nor has the rate of rise increased significantly over the past few decades (see link).
The heat waves or major forest fires observed (in USA, Australia, Europe) might have been created using HAARP technology and not necessarily be the result of global warming. Modern science is the first to tell us we should not trust our senses but not for climate change: Every weather events or heat / cold waves are linked to climate change in the media.They has already planned to make climate change the next bing thing after Covid (See link).

Is this global warming man-made ?

Now let's assume there is indeed a global warming, it would most certainly come from natural reasons and not being man-made.

The global temperature trend might be cyclical : In the previous graphic from the IPCC 1st AR, there was a Medieval warm period with higher temperatures than today while there was no greenhouse gas emissions (So the temperatures may rise without human intervention). Most of the honest climate studies acknowledge the presence of a Medieval warm period.

There is a serious possibility that the global temperature changes are directly and majorly influenced by solar radiations. A study made by nearly two dozen scientists found that the rising global temperatures may be caused by the sun rather than carbon dioxide (see link and link). Sadly the journal that published them retracted it due to peer pressure (See retracted paper, or summarized here). Another study was made by analyzing sunspots and reached the same conclusions.

The scientific evidences that the greenhouse gas greatly impact our climate are dubious. A study published in a peer-reviewed journal finds that climate models exaggerate the global warming from CO2 emissions by as much as 45%. Another scientist debunked the greenhouse-warming theory as not even physically possible (see link and review)

New World Order Agenda

Who benefits from the hoax ?

As the saying goes 'all roads lead to Rome', here 'all hoaxes lead to the New World Order'. Just follow the trail of blood.
The concept of man-made climate change was created in 1972 by an illuminati group called 'Club of Rome'. Their apocalyptic scenario for mankind was reported in their book 'The limits to growth'. This group is part of the Round Table as explained in the page 'Illuminati Philantropy', they are actively pushing the ecological dictatorship agenda.

They stated is clearly in 'The First Global Revolution', 1991 :
"The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself."

As explained previously, The UN thanks to the IPCC is calling the shots regarding the debate on climate change.
The same UN that give consultative status to the powerful institution ‘Lucifer Publishing’ company (now renamed ‘Lucis Trust’) as explained in the page 'What is the New World Order ?'.
The same UN that host David Spangler as 'Director of Planetary Initiative' who has open satanist luciferian views.
The same UN whose Headquarter is full of satanic signs & symbols (see video).

The end goal of those lies is to make people believe the earth is overpopulated and humanity is a cancer destroying everything that need to be culled drastically to save our 'mother earth'.

The UN says that the Earth's population will soon reach 8 billion people and it is overpopulated. Here's what 8 billion of us standing 3 ft. apart in a grid (3 feet left to right, and 3 feet front to back) would look like. A square only 50.8 miles on a side. The Earth is not overpopulated, the global population is simply not evenly distributed as the majority prefer to live in densely populated cities.

All humanity could fit in this square

A solution that the satanic elites could have taken to curb the demographic increase is to redistribute their enormous amount of wealth worldwide and build a strong educated middle class. 3rd world countries would have made their demographic transition and reduce their birth rates naturally. People from the lower classes make children as a survival reflex, it is a biological need to transmit your genes in an uncertain future. Once people reach the middle class and get educated, their future is better assured and they leave the constant survival mode and have less children. Most rich countries worldwide have a strong middle class and low birth rate (The population doesn't live in constant survival mode).
Between this humane solution and slaughtering 70% of the population / enslaving the remaining 30%, the illuminatis have made their choice.

Those IPCC reports have been used to justify international efforts to try and reduce carbon dioxide emissions, such as the Kyoto Protocol (1997) and the more recent Paris Treaty (2015). Those accords are totally useless if used in order to reduce global warming (see page). However they are a great way to slowly but surely impose an ecological totalitarian state which is the true end-goal of all of this.

The man-made climate change hoax was needed to justify the creation of a carbon market (a high speculative market whose allowances' prices have gone to the roof). But also the carbon tax which is a gigantic hoax that some citizens already start to feel the cost. Our individual carbon footprint will be automatically calculated and some companies already have the technology put into place (See link and link). In the end, the citizens will have to severely restrict what they do because of this sword of Damocles upon their head.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) (another satanic institution) is actively pushing for the net zero: An impossible task to reduce the global net human-caused of carbon dioxide to 0 by 2050. Of course in order to 'save the planet' from the man-made climate change hoax they created in the first place. This insanity will impact all aspects of our lives : large cities are becoming self-sufficient smart cities (more like high-tech ghetto), the companies will drastically reduce their CO2, no more industrial farming that produce too much CO2 according to the IPCC and of course the citizens will need to keep a total of carbon emission equal to 0. If you want an idea of what it will be, you can read the post 'Welcome to the 2030 New World Order'.

The New World Order is more than an ecological dictatorship, it is a full-blown satanic one-world society. The NWO will continue to push the man-made climate change hoax to the extremes and use it for nefarious purposes. It is already used to destroy farming and provoke the coming famine (link and link) and it will be used to enslave humanity.

This is why exposing their hoaxes is important, it destroys the foundation of the NWO monster they are building by awakening people to the deception (Remember they always need your consent).
Exposing their lies is already fighting the New World Order. Many scientists, journalists, doctors paid the price fully, most with their jobs and reputation and some with their lives.